<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Impact Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Adventures in Environmental Health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How Not to Report on Health Risks – Consumer Reports on Heavy Metals in Protein Powders by JLowe</title>
		<link>http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>JLowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

Thanks for commenting.  Haven&#039;t done that comparison yet, but it would be an interesting perspective on the cleanup standards for hazardous constituents in soil.  You bring up a good point about the speciation of arsenic, and I&#039;ll explore it further when I get back to arsenic (I&#039;m teeing up another post on it).  Again, thanks for your comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.  Haven&#8217;t done that comparison yet, but it would be an interesting perspective on the cleanup standards for hazardous constituents in soil.  You bring up a good point about the speciation of arsenic, and I&#8217;ll explore it further when I get back to arsenic (I&#8217;m teeing up another post on it).  Again, thanks for your comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Not to Report on Health Risks – Consumer Reports on Heavy Metals in Protein Powders by Bill M</title>
		<link>http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62#comment-406</guid>
		<description>JLowe: thanks for the interesting review of the CR report. Have you compared the dose that you might get from a protein powder with residential risk-based screening levels used for evaluating soil cleanup at (say) old orchard sites contaminated with lead arsenate? The RBCs seem to be overly conservative the the lens of arsenic speciation (i.e., the soils are contaminated with arsenate rather than the more toxic arsenite).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JLowe: thanks for the interesting review of the CR report. Have you compared the dose that you might get from a protein powder with residential risk-based screening levels used for evaluating soil cleanup at (say) old orchard sites contaminated with lead arsenate? The RBCs seem to be overly conservative the the lens of arsenic speciation (i.e., the soils are contaminated with arsenate rather than the more toxic arsenite).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Not to Report on Health Risks – Consumer Reports on Heavy Metals in Protein Powders by Are Protein Drinks Dangerous? A Postscript &#124; True Alpha Training</title>
		<link>http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Protein Drinks Dangerous? A Postscript &#124; True Alpha Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactscienceonline.com/wordpress/?p=62#comment-384</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
